Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Self built and self assembly ;)

Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black

User avatar
Danger Mouse
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 11524
meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 3:32 pm
Location: Jafa Land
Has liked: 353 times
Been liked: 663 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by Danger Mouse »

Slowy wrote:
Danger Mouse wrote:Flame maple, burst, low-gain at the subtle rotation of a volume knob...what more could you want?

Image
Fat, old, grey haired fart slinging that.... there's enough humiliation in my life already. :lol:
I really like Explorers, but even the people who love me agree I look ridiculous wearing one.
Ha that is a good point... there's a fine line between growing old disgracefully and just looking like a fecking idiot :lol:
The older I get, the more disappointed in myself I become.

User avatar
Slowy
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 22795
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:13 pm
Location: Orcland
Has liked: 1018 times
Been liked: 2483 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by Slowy »

Vince wrote:
Slowy wrote:Fat, old, grey haired fart slinging that.... there's enough humiliation in my life already. :lol:
I really like Explorers, but even the people who love me agree I look ridiculous wearing one.
Didn't bother this guy... :lol:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8j3NUzPBw4[/youtube]
Black guys are born with bonus cool points.
Beyond a critical point within a finite space, freedom diminishes as numbers increase. This is as true of humans as it is of gas molecules in a sealed flask. The human question is not how many can possibly survive within the system, but what kind of existence is possible for those who so survive.

User avatar
bender
Darth Fader
Posts: 11849
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
Location: Dorkland
Has liked: 415 times
Been liked: 1011 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by bender »

jimi wrote:Also with the JM/Jag I don't like the trem (personal preference) but the guitar just looks wrong without it..
Wash your mouth out! They're a glorious thing!

User avatar
bender
Darth Fader
Posts: 11849
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
Location: Dorkland
Has liked: 415 times
Been liked: 1011 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by bender »

One of these shapes made out of Korina would be pretty ace:

Image
Image

User avatar
Vince
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 7456
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:31 pm
Location: Upper Hutt The Brave
Has liked: 389 times
Been liked: 186 times
Contact:

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by Vince »

Is that the middle-age-spreadcaster model, is it? ;) seriously, I don't like them, they're too bulbous.

Then again, this thread is not about me.
"Vince, have you ever tried playing an expensive bass?" - Polarbear.
"And isn't that the finest acoustic bass guitar feedback solo you've ever heard?" - Billy Moose.

My Bandcamp Page
Facebook

User avatar
jimi
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 3401
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 2:23 pm
Location: Auckland
Has liked: 844 times
Been liked: 359 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by jimi »

bender wrote:
jimi wrote:Also with the JM/Jag I don't like the trem (personal preference) but the guitar just looks wrong without it..
Wash your mouth out! They're a glorious thing!
Actually there is one thing I like about the JM trem that many other trems don't have - you can lock it (and remove the arm and throw it away).

The only thing Trems seem to do on my guitars is make them go out of tune.

User avatar
kdawg2a
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 3369
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:28 pm
Location: U S and A
Has liked: 240 times
Been liked: 1047 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by kdawg2a »

I can't help but think how good a telecaster is a a platform for this kind of thing. They seem to lend themselves well to pick up mods and wood choices and they are very easy to work with. You already like the scale length and they're very easy to build.
1935 Martin D-45, 1942 Gibson Southern Jumbo,1950 Fender Broadcaster, 1954 Fender Strat, 1958 Gibson Moderne prototype, 1959 Gibson Les Paul Standard.
1958 Fender twin, 1965 Vox AC30, 1966 Marshall JTM 45, 1977 Dumble OD Special.
Big black garbage bag full of original Klon Centaurs and TS808s.

User avatar
Slowy
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 22795
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:13 pm
Location: Orcland
Has liked: 1018 times
Been liked: 2483 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by Slowy »

kdawg2a wrote:I can't help but think how good a telecaster is a a platform for this kind of thing. They seem to lend themselves well to pick up mods and wood choices and they are very easy to work with. You already like the scale length and they're very easy to build.
True that. I think the Jazzmaster thing has to do with having Strats and Teles and wanting the whole set
Beyond a critical point within a finite space, freedom diminishes as numbers increase. This is as true of humans as it is of gas molecules in a sealed flask. The human question is not how many can possibly survive within the system, but what kind of existence is possible for those who so survive.

User avatar
Slowy
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 22795
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:13 pm
Location: Orcland
Has liked: 1018 times
Been liked: 2483 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by Slowy »

Vince wrote:Is that the middle-age-spreadcaster model, is it? ;) seriously, I don't like them, they're too bulbous.

Then again, this thread is not about me.
Middleage Spreadcaster.

I love it! Can I have that? Pleeeease? :angel:
Beyond a critical point within a finite space, freedom diminishes as numbers increase. This is as true of humans as it is of gas molecules in a sealed flask. The human question is not how many can possibly survive within the system, but what kind of existence is possible for those who so survive.

User avatar
bender
Darth Fader
Posts: 11849
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
Location: Dorkland
Has liked: 415 times
Been liked: 1011 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by bender »

Vince wrote:Is that the middle-age-spreadcaster model, is it? ;) seriously, I don't like them, they're too bulbous.

Then again, this thread is not about me.
If you saw that top one in the flesh, you wouldn't think that. They're tiny.

User avatar
HackSaw
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 6:34 am
Location: AKL
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 519 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by HackSaw »

I wish you'd stop posting Reverends Ben, it keeps reminding me how much I want this that is on special at RS..
Attachments
1390453875whIII_390_VBST_main.jpg

User avatar
StrummersOfThunder
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 7200
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
Has liked: 815 times
Been liked: 1304 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by StrummersOfThunder »

jimi wrote:
bender wrote:
jimi wrote:Also with the JM/Jag I don't like the trem (personal preference) but the guitar just looks wrong without it..
Wash your mouth out! They're a glorious thing!
Actually there is one thing I like about the JM trem that many other trems don't have - you can lock it (and remove the arm and throw it away).

The only thing Trems seem to do on my guitars is make them go out of tune.
The JM/jag trem properly set up is seldom the cause of tuning issues. More often it is the nut. Or the nut playing it.
One of Leo's finest inventions that trem.

User avatar
Starfire
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 4423
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:20 am
Location: Te Whanganui-a-Tara
Has liked: 243 times
Been liked: 598 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by Starfire »

HackSaw wrote:I wish you'd stop posting Reverends Ben, it keeps reminding me how much I want this that is on special at RS..
I'm becoming increasingly fond of this one:
Image

User avatar
StrummersOfThunder
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 7200
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
Has liked: 815 times
Been liked: 1304 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by StrummersOfThunder »

twangnsnarl wrote:
HackSaw wrote:I wish you'd stop posting Reverends Ben, it keeps reminding me how much I want this that is on special at RS..
I'm becoming increasingly fond of this one:
Image
Oh Lordy. That is nice.

User avatar
handsoffmatt
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 2711
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Sydney
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 244 times

Re: Humbuckers and Body Shapes

Post by handsoffmatt »

Going back to the OP's question.

EVERYTHING makes a difference to a guitar's tone and/or tactility. Size, shape, body wood type, body thickness, tuners, bridge, neck size, neck wood, fretboard wood, fret material, nut material, setup, pickups.......everything.

By far the biggest tonal factor is the pickups. After that you are looking at varying degrees of subtle differences for all of the above factors. I would put body size/thickness and body wood type as being some of the more major factors in that list, but we're still not talking a tone change as much as changing pickups. This is where we start talking more about the playing tactility - which will be significantly altered by body size/shape/wood type.

That's why getting a custom guitar built (or buying a guitar without playing it first) can be a bit of a crap shoot unless you know what you're talking about or exactly what you like.

The good news is that there are no rules of what is "better" or "worse". Only what you like. That gives you a great reason to go down to a music store and play a bunch of guitars so you can figure out what works for YOU.
"Volume is tone" - EVH

Electrics: ESP/Fender/Gibson/.strandberg*/Godin/Washburn/Music Man/Knaggs/Squier/Vintage
Acoustic: Cole Clark/Godin/Takamine/Taylor
Amps: BOSS Katana Head / Friedman Smallbox

Post Reply