Cubase vs. reverb processing
Moderator: Capt. Black
- rickenbackerkid
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 6739
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:52 pm
- Has liked: 210 times
- Been liked: 662 times
Re: Cubase vs. reverb processing
I'm sure that you can indeed do that, but I wouldn't know how too . . . having never used cubase.
- bender
- Darth Fader
- Posts: 11870
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
- Location: Dorkland
- Has liked: 417 times
- Been liked: 1017 times
Re: Cubase vs. reverb processing
Are you using the reverbs on aux channels using sends per channel? Or are you inserting the reverb plug-in on the channels you want reverb on?
- bender
- Darth Fader
- Posts: 11870
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
- Location: Dorkland
- Has liked: 417 times
- Been liked: 1017 times
Re: Cubase vs. reverb processing
OK, you can insert a single reverb plugin on an aux channel and use aux sends on every source channel to send to that one reverb. Way less processing required.
- crowbgood1
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 2917
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:19 pm
- Location: New Plymouth
- Has liked: 361 times
- Been liked: 260 times
Re: Cubase vs. reverb processing
Yes. Click project>add track>FX track>then add your plugin>on the track you want the plugin(reverb) go to sends>pick your reverb> add the amount you desire.bender wrote:OK, you can insert a single reverb plugin on an aux channel and use aux sends on every source channel to send to that one reverb. Way less processing required.
A sure cure for seasickness is to sit under a tree.
- crowbgood1
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 2917
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:19 pm
- Location: New Plymouth
- Has liked: 361 times
- Been liked: 260 times
Re: Cubase vs. reverb processing
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yjnVqjufs0[/youtube]
A sure cure for seasickness is to sit under a tree.
- Bg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 43360
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 12:13 am
- Location: Auckland
- Has liked: 2269 times
- Been liked: 3930 times
Re: Cubase vs. reverb processing
the straw that broke the camels back. You know you can lock audio as well which basically copies the track out as audio and saves the processing power. If you unlock it then reverts to the track and your plugins.
But yeah, an aux channel is the best way, unless you're using a different type of reverb on every track....
But yeah, an aux channel is the best way, unless you're using a different type of reverb on every track....
So, is that low alcohol or no alcohol at all? mmmm, no alcohol, do you want to try it? Noooooooooo.
- bender
- Darth Fader
- Posts: 11870
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
- Location: Dorkland
- Has liked: 417 times
- Been liked: 1017 times
Re: Cubase vs. reverb processing
Really? That's like page 1, chapter 1Frey wrote:Thanks guys but I'm way to dumb to figure this out. I just turned it off until I did the mixdown.
of audio engineering.
- philly
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 1466
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:47 pm
- Location: Dunedin
- Has liked: 146 times
- Been liked: 126 times
Re: Cubase vs. reverb processing
you could also print a stereo pair of your reverbs ... bit harder to go back on tho
“Millions long for immortality who don’t know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon.”
- crowbgood1
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 2917
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:19 pm
- Location: New Plymouth
- Has liked: 361 times
- Been liked: 260 times
Re: Cubase vs. reverb processing
The thing I like about using the same reverb from a send, but in different amounts on different tracks, you can create a feeling of everything being in the same space, but a different positions. Creating an illusion of reality for the listener.
A sure cure for seasickness is to sit under a tree.
- philly
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 1466
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:47 pm
- Location: Dunedin
- Has liked: 146 times
- Been liked: 126 times
Re: Cubase vs. reverb processing
you speak the truth my friend... thats how it was done in the olden days with aux sends and returns.. as previous poster bg said
i cant imagine running out of resource but people do
obviously
i cant imagine running out of resource but people do
obviously
“Millions long for immortality who don’t know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon.”
- crowbgood1
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 2917
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:19 pm
- Location: New Plymouth
- Has liked: 361 times
- Been liked: 260 times
Re: Cubase vs. reverb processing
The modern sequencer is the olden day desk. The insert channel is for compression, gate and eq. The ambient stuff should be shared. Well after that you need to get personal, like parallel comp, group channel comp and reveb on ... well stuff ya wannna put together.philly wrote:you speak the truth my friend... thats how it was done in the olden days with aux sends and returns.. as previous poster bg said
i cant imagine running out of resource but people do
obviously
The endless quest for improvement is unstoppable. To give up at first base is unbelievable.
A sure cure for seasickness is to sit under a tree.