Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black
- Molly
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 24984
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 12:17 pm
- Has liked: 2495 times
- Been liked: 2804 times
Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
Changed the strings on my '03 LP Classic last night and took a peek at the pickups. Made me wonder if anybody knows what pickups they've used over the years and what their characteristics are thought to be? Are there too many for that to be realistic?
This is what's in my '03 Classic.
This is what's in my '03 Classic.
- sizzlingbadger
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8298
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:12 am
- Location: Wire Wrapper
- Has liked: 1213 times
- Been liked: 1407 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
Trouble is everyone's "judgement" and "descriptions" are different, making it an almost impossible task.
For example, I like Classic 57's but they do have an "edge" to them that some will call harsh
For example, I like Classic 57's but they do have an "edge" to them that some will call harsh
Last edited by sizzlingbadger on Mon May 24, 2021 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Revolt Against the Solid State"
- NippleWrestler
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 2938
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 5:05 pm
- Has liked: 81 times
- Been liked: 1079 times
- Molly
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 24984
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 12:17 pm
- Has liked: 2495 times
- Been liked: 2804 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
Kind of figured as much. I often see the same ones being sold on TM so figure they're unpopular and regularly upgraded. Can't think what their name is at the moment.sizzlingbadger wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 9:46 am Trouble is everyones "judgement" and "descriptions" are different, making it an almost impossible task.
For example I like Classic 57's but they do have an "edge" to them that some will call harsh
I've only tried these through my THR10 so it's too soon to comment.
- GrantB
- ADMIN
- Posts: 15939
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:04 am
- Location: Where I need to be
- Has liked: 1365 times
- Been liked: 2100 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
There are a lot...and all a nuance on the same thing. 57’s are cool, and yes they do have an upper edge to them, but a lot of mainstream Gibson buckers from 1960 to now have also. But by era there are differences. For some reason, even with construction changes, P90s have been relatively consistent sounding since 1960
"Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible god and destroys a visible nature. Unaware that this nature he's destroying is this god he's worshipping." - Hubert Reeves
- codedog
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 6784
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:44 pm
- Location: Christchurch
- Has liked: 3506 times
- Been liked: 1092 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
I have only ever played 1 set of Gibson pickups... 57 Classic and 57 Classic Plus pair. I can't recall details but I liked them, compared to other humbuckers I have tried. It was a nice set to play.
- NippleWrestler
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 2938
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 5:05 pm
- Has liked: 81 times
- Been liked: 1079 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
My buddy Josh at Homewrecker pickups told me the most commonly replaced pickups for them are the 490T and R.Molly wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 9:48 amKind of figured as much. I often see the same ones being sold on TM so figure they're unpopular and regularly upgraded. Can't think what their name is at the moment.sizzlingbadger wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 9:46 am Trouble is everyones "judgement" and "descriptions" are different, making it an almost impossible task.
For example I like Classic 57's but they do have an "edge" to them that some will call harsh
I've only tried these through my THR10 so it's too soon to comment.
- Molly
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 24984
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 12:17 pm
- Has liked: 2495 times
- Been liked: 2804 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
That's what I was thinking of. I guess they must be pretty muddy-sounding or something like that?NippleWrestler wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 10:45 am
My buddy Josh at Homewrecker pickups told me the most commonly replaced pickups for them are the 490T and R.
- Reg18
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 3703
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:57 pm
- Has liked: 320 times
- Been liked: 949 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
I’ve got a set of 57s in my epiphone LP at the moment and really like them actually. I’ve heard mixed reports on them.
My old 97 LP Standard had Burst Buckers (maybe 2?) and they had more articulation but I never really liked them tbh. To much high treble on the bridge and a bit muddy on the neck. Had a few Gibson with the 490/490t? Sets, they were ok, not sure if I’d say they were worse than the burst buckers, hotter I think.
I also had a T Top in a 91 SG standard (replaced the original 490) which people raved about all over the interwebs and I never liked, sounded weak and dull compared say a Classic 57. Everyone has a different opinion though!
My old 97 LP Standard had Burst Buckers (maybe 2?) and they had more articulation but I never really liked them tbh. To much high treble on the bridge and a bit muddy on the neck. Had a few Gibson with the 490/490t? Sets, they were ok, not sure if I’d say they were worse than the burst buckers, hotter I think.
I also had a T Top in a 91 SG standard (replaced the original 490) which people raved about all over the interwebs and I never liked, sounded weak and dull compared say a Classic 57. Everyone has a different opinion though!
- olegmcnoleg
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 5576
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 11:26 am
- Location: Awkland
- Has liked: 866 times
- Been liked: 742 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
I Like the Classic 57s, and the Custom Burstbuckers. I also like the SD alinco pro II (a bit more bluesy) and the Lollar Imperials. If I want a higher output or more mids, I'll use a boost pedal.
-
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 9:42 pm
- Location: CHCH
- Has liked: 558 times
- Been liked: 175 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
I like the 490 set but I think they are a bit too "inbetween" - too hot to PAF but not quite mid gain. Probably why they get swapped out so often. Also because they are the most common set.
I think they are both A2 magnets too which isn't my first pick for bridge pickups. A2 have a certain sound about them. If the 490T had an A5 magnet I think there would be less changing.
Doesn't everyone feel compelled to change something on a Gibson they buy anyway? unless it's a posh one?
I think they are both A2 magnets too which isn't my first pick for bridge pickups. A2 have a certain sound about them. If the 490T had an A5 magnet I think there would be less changing.
Doesn't everyone feel compelled to change something on a Gibson they buy anyway? unless it's a posh one?
- NippleWrestler
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 2938
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 5:05 pm
- Has liked: 81 times
- Been liked: 1079 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
The opposite on the bridge I heard - too bright and shrill. Gibson's bumph says "... but with a modern edge that delivers a more contemporary tonal range..." so make of that what you will. There's reviews on Sweetwater saying they're the best bridge pup going so who knows? People like to change stuff for the sake of changing stuff I guess, also today I feel we're coming out of a high-output pickup phase and going into more low-medium output for clarity and articulation under high gain. Maybe the 490T was just anachronistic.Molly wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 11:01 amThat's what I was thinking of. I guess they must be pretty muddy-sounding or something like that?NippleWrestler wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 10:45 am
My buddy Josh at Homewrecker pickups told me the most commonly replaced pickups for them are the 490T and R.
-
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 9:42 pm
- Location: CHCH
- Has liked: 558 times
- Been liked: 175 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
I still think about the zebra 61 pickups I put in an epiphone studio to brighten it up and then flicked it on. Dumb move. They were cool pickups and deserved better. A5 scatterwound coils and one coil over wound for deliberate mismatch. You could get some cool summing options with those on a super switch. I was a rookie back then but I recall twangy/snappy and bright
- Molly
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 24984
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 12:17 pm
- Has liked: 2495 times
- Been liked: 2804 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
All that sounds like my cuppa tea. Especially if it's unpotted.Mattallica wrote: ↑Mon May 24, 2021 11:44 am I still think about the zebra 61 pickups I put in an epiphone studio to brighten it up and then flicked it on. Dumb move. They were cool pickups and deserved better. A5 scatterwound coils and one coil over wound for deliberate mismatch. You could get some cool summing options with those on a super switch. I was a rookie back then but I recall twangy/snappy and bright
- GrantB
- ADMIN
- Posts: 15939
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:04 am
- Location: Where I need to be
- Has liked: 1365 times
- Been liked: 2100 times
Re: Stock Gibson Pickups - A potted history
490’s can sound good...need to match with right pots
"Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible god and destroys a visible nature. Unaware that this nature he's destroying is this god he's worshipping." - Hubert Reeves