Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black
- Pastasauce
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 3447
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 11:02 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 30 times
Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
Really interesting Pete Thorn video here...
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOWeoizp4y0&feature=plcp[/youtube]
Of course, my pedalboard is a mish-mash of buffered and true bypass pedals... not sure what that does to the tone.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOWeoizp4y0&feature=plcp[/youtube]
Of course, my pedalboard is a mish-mash of buffered and true bypass pedals... not sure what that does to the tone.
- sizzlingbadger
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8304
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:12 am
- Location: Wire Wrapper
- Has liked: 1218 times
- Been liked: 1408 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
nothing wrong with a good buffer, it can improve tone by reducing impedance mis-match losses etc. A good buffer at the start of the pedal chain is good in IMHO.
"Revolt Against the Solid State"
- Scooter13
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 6:24 pm
- Location: Wellington
- Has liked: 40 times
- Been liked: 69 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
Yeah, what that vid fails to mention is the effect of stacking too many buffered pedals in a line. I'd like to hear 5 buffered pedals in a row versus 1 buffered and 4 TB.
And then there's fuzz and active pickups, which don't like buffers....just to add to the confusion.
And then there's fuzz and active pickups, which don't like buffers....just to add to the confusion.
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
+1Scooter13 wrote:Yeah, what that vid fails to mention is the effect of stacking too many buffered pedals in a line. I'd like to hear 5 buffered pedals in a row versus 1 buffered and 4 TB.
And then there's fuzz and active pickups, which don't like buffers....just to add to the confusion.
A good buffer is indeed a good thing, but like most things in guitarland, there's many exceptions to the rule.
THE AMP SHOP LTD
Boutique Amplifiers, Guitars & Effects
Repairs, Modifications & Custom Work
http://www.ampshop.co.nz
Boutique Amplifiers, Guitars & Effects
Repairs, Modifications & Custom Work
http://www.ampshop.co.nz
- Single coil
- BANNED
- Posts: 10050
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:35 pm
- Location: Public toilet
- Has liked: 1110 times
- Been liked: 485 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
I used to run about 5 buffered pedals and maybe one or two TB pedals with no negative effects.Scooter13 wrote:Yeah, what that vid fails to mention is the effect of stacking too many buffered pedals in a line. I'd like to hear 5 buffered pedals in a row versus 1 buffered and 4 TB.
On another note, I have a strong feeling this is going to quickly become a heated debate thread.
werdna wrote:Well at least I can still make toast in the bath without anyone telling me it's unsafe.
- jeremyb
- Chorus of Organs
- Posts: 41496
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
- Has liked: 7840 times
- Been liked: 4229 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
HD500.
Slowy wrote: That's the problem; everything rewarding is just such hard work. Regret takes much less effort.
- Pastasauce
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 3447
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 11:02 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 30 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
Quick dumb question... do buffered pedals add or amplify the highs in your signal? Does that mean if you have 4 in your chain (like me) you will be getting more treble in your signal than you would plugging straight into the amp?
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
Well, what do your ears tell you?
Hot_Grits wrote:Someone should print this thread out and hang it in an art gallery.
- sizzlingbadger
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8304
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:12 am
- Location: Wire Wrapper
- Has liked: 1218 times
- Been liked: 1408 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
A good buffer will not add or subtract EQ but not all buffers are good. You may perceive to get more treble out of a good buffer as it is reducing treble losses as clearly audible in the video. If the first pedal in the chain is buffered it can really help reduce losses due to cable capacitance which is what that video is showing specifically.Rhettsauce wrote:Quick dumb question... do buffered pedals add or amplify the highs in your signal? Does that mean if you have 4 in your chain (like me) you will be getting more treble in your signal than you would plugging straight into the amp?
The age-old argument that buffers are bad or true bypass is good/bad is just nonsense, as usual it depends on the quality of the buffer and where in the chain they are placed. For example its good to have a buffered pedal in front of a pedal with a low input impedance as it reduces the losses you would otherwise experience.
"Revolt Against the Solid State"
- rickenbackerkid
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 6741
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:52 pm
- Has liked: 210 times
- Been liked: 663 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
I just buy pedals that sound good. Only one of the them is TB, so I surmise that I prefer the buffered way of things.
- sizzlingbadger
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8304
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:12 am
- Location: Wire Wrapper
- Has liked: 1218 times
- Been liked: 1408 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
Some don't like True Bypass due the fact they often pop / click when you press the foot-switch.
"Revolt Against the Solid State"
- Single coil
- BANNED
- Posts: 10050
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:35 pm
- Location: Public toilet
- Has liked: 1110 times
- Been liked: 485 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
YES!sizzlingbadger wrote: The age-old argument that buffers are bad or true bypass is good/bad is just nonsense
Bad input impendance causes the thing all the real uppity people (cork sniffers?) call "tone suck". Bad input impendance I have found to be unheard of with Boss pedals. Funny, cuz they get whinged about the most.
Oh, and crybaby pedals. But they're supposed to be notorious for it.
And a pint for you too.bbrunskill wrote:I just buy pedals that sound good. Only one of the them is TB, so I surmise that I prefer the buffered way of things.
Buffers help. They push your signal along. Too much true bypass = you lose signal.
werdna wrote:Well at least I can still make toast in the bath without anyone telling me it's unsafe.
- MogwaiBoy
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 2346
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:35 pm
- Has liked: 157 times
- Been liked: 242 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
That video rules (though the old guy mumbles a bit). I'm glad they used a humble and much maligned DS-1 too. Point proven - except as stated there are exceptions (Fuzzfaces with buffers before them etc) and not all buffers are created equal.
- rickenbackerkid
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 6741
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:52 pm
- Has liked: 210 times
- Been liked: 663 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
the more I play guitar, the more I realize that Boss just gets it right. They do NOT 'suck tone', the form and case design is better that anything else, and they sound really good.
- sizzlingbadger
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8304
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:12 am
- Location: Wire Wrapper
- Has liked: 1218 times
- Been liked: 1408 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
My Boss DD20 was a great pedal, very well built and didn't suck tone.
"Revolt Against the Solid State"