I've had the Boss TU-2, DD-3, DD-5, DD-20, RV-3, RV-2, BD-2, SD-1, OD-3, OS-2, DS-1, DF-2, TR-2, PH-2, DC-2, and GE-7. They were all awesome.
Really regret selling the DD and RV stuff.
Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black
- rickenbackerkid
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 6723
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:52 pm
- Has liked: 209 times
- Been liked: 657 times
- Pastasauce
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 3447
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 11:02 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 30 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
I have a lot of Boss pedals, and for me the only general exception to this is overdrives. Most Boss overdrives just don't have the same level of responsiveness (getting more distorted under heavy pick attack... cleaning up when you wind down the guitar volume... stuff like that) as some of the booteek pedals, in my experience.bbrunskill wrote:the more I play guitar, the more I realize that Boss just gets it right. They do NOT 'suck tone', the form and case design is better that anything else, and they sound really good.
Of course I haven't tried every Boss pedal out there so I could be wrong.
But current board is full of booteek overdrives, and stock standard everything else (reverb, delay, tremolo, compression, wah etc).
- alanp
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 4637
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:51 am
- Location: Wanganui
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 11 times
- Contact:
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
My flanger doesn't pop so much as CRACK! when I stomp on it I need to look at it some more.sizzlingbadger wrote:Some don't like True Bypass due the fact they often pop / click when you press the foot-switch.
Capt. Black wrote:Call me if you're looking for the sound of a sows ear made from a silk purse with a side of hot bitches and alcohol
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
Sometimes you can have eq effects from pedals that you like as well. I've heard that some guitarists intentionally use a long spiral guitar cable because they like the sound it gives them.
They only hard and fast rule is that if you use a long chain of only TB pedals then you will loose treble. What happens when you use more than one buffer depends on the buffers and the arrangement of pedals.
Also note that when a pedal is engaged it will be acting as a buffer most of the time, so if you use a pedal as "always on" then you can count it.
They only hard and fast rule is that if you use a long chain of only TB pedals then you will loose treble. What happens when you use more than one buffer depends on the buffers and the arrangement of pedals.
Also note that when a pedal is engaged it will be acting as a buffer most of the time, so if you use a pedal as "always on" then you can count it.
Ok I got rid of my Foal quote, but I found a new one.
foal30 wrote:some 80's metal makes me want to dress up like a woman, just like they did back in the day.
is this sort of what you mean?
- Pastasauce
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 3447
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 11:02 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 30 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
Another great video that answers some of my questions...
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNU5NZQGF2Y&feature=plcp[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNU5NZQGF2Y&feature=plcp[/youtube]
-
- Mr Echo
- Posts: 4477
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 7:33 am
- Location: East Coast
- Has liked: 358 times
- Been liked: 283 times
Re: Buffered vs True Bypass Pedals
An easier way to manage this is to just play like a noob, solves my tone issues
"Cash on the ballot, money to burn, Dealey Plaza, make a left-hand turn" Bob Dylan is a genius