Going wireless

Lets all drool over your stuff :)

Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black

User avatar
Danger Mouse
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 12214
meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 3:32 pm
Location: Jafa Land
Has liked: 407 times
Been liked: 727 times

Re: Going wireless

Post by Danger Mouse »

bbrunskill wrote:
finn61 wrote:Haha yeah i think that's what I was told, no rush for digital wireless because 2.4GHz band is and will become more crowded. Plus because of the whole analog tv shutdown, the lower UHF bands that aren't going to be used for LTE are even freer than before for UHF systems. Either way, if you don't have too much crowding that you start losing bits in digital systems, you're all good anyway.
Just a note to say there is nothing wrong with digital wireless. Digital wireless is brilliant, and 1000x better than analog, but as you say, the 2.4ghz band is crowded. What you really want is Digital wireless in the 502-606 MHz or 622-698 MHz band.
There are Digital TV stations in that band, but you can usually avoid them.
This, and 2.4Ghz is only going to get worse. Although a word of warning, some parallel imported wireless systems operate in the 700Mhz spectrum, even ones that state 622-698MHz. If your system does operate in the 700MHz range, you will get problems and keep going long enough, you'll get a knock on the door too.
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll spend thousands on fishing equipment he'll use for a bit, then get bored and move onto something else.

User avatar
finn61
Ashton
Ashton
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 1:17 pm
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 9 times

Re: Going wireless

Post by finn61 »

Danger Mouse wrote:
bbrunskill wrote:
finn61 wrote:Haha yeah i think that's what I was told, no rush for digital wireless because 2.4GHz band is and will become more crowded. Plus because of the whole analog tv shutdown, the lower UHF bands that aren't going to be used for LTE are even freer than before for UHF systems. Either way, if you don't have too much crowding that you start losing bits in digital systems, you're all good anyway.
Just a note to say there is nothing wrong with digital wireless. Digital wireless is brilliant, and 1000x better than analog, but as you say, the 2.4ghz band is crowded. What you really want is Digital wireless in the 502-606 MHz or 622-698 MHz band.
There are Digital TV stations in that band, but you can usually avoid them.
This, and 2.4Ghz is only going to get worse. Although a word of warning, some parallel imported wireless systems operate in the 700Mhz spectrum, even ones that state 622-698MHz. If your system does operate in the 700MHz range, you will get problems and keep going long enough, you'll get a knock on the door too.
Agree with all the above :)

Post Reply