fretboard preference - why?
Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black
- angry_young_poet
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 1890
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2003 12:04 am
- Location: Wellington
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 14 times
Given a choice (like building my own gats) I love the look of Maple!
And I really don't like Rosewood when I see them badly worn. However an ebony or Rosewood neck with a top class inlay job, something interesting and unique I could go for!
The Tele I have coming was bought with a Rosewood neck, but I have a Maple neck coming for it too!..guess I get to choose!
And Like TMG says..the size of fret is more important.
And I really don't like Rosewood when I see them badly worn. However an ebony or Rosewood neck with a top class inlay job, something interesting and unique I could go for!
The Tele I have coming was bought with a Rosewood neck, but I have a Maple neck coming for it too!..guess I get to choose!
And Like TMG says..the size of fret is more important.
We can forgive the child who is afraid of the dark, we cannot forgive the adult who is afraid of the light!
- ash
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 7505
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 4:01 pm
- Location: Auckland, NZ
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 5 times
Fret size doesn't really bother me that much. I prefer larger ones, but small is fine.... just like boobies
I don't mind the neck profile either. I played a PRS today with a big fat baseball bat sized neck and it was no more a problem than a skinny Ibanez Wizard neck.
I don't mind the neck profile either. I played a PRS today with a big fat baseball bat sized neck and it was no more a problem than a skinny Ibanez Wizard neck.
http://ashcustomworks.com for custom built electric guitars hand made in new zealand
Yeah I'm a Rosewood man, I havn't tried Ebony though. I like the feel of it, maple feels way too much like plastic. Plus Roisewood looks nicer.
Yeah the only issue I had with going from Jackson neck size to '59 LP neck was like hitting a bend on the high e at the 22nd fret while standing but it's not too bad.
Yeah the only issue I had with going from Jackson neck size to '59 LP neck was like hitting a bend on the high e at the 22nd fret while standing but it's not too bad.
Can be a bit hard to get used to if you have a heavy touch on the freting hand (as you can end up pressing down hard enough that the notes go sharp). Once i got used to it, I found playing a normal fretboard to be quite strange... Vibrato and bends seem to be easier on a scalloped fretboard.Tsuken wrote:I've never played anything with a scalloped neck. What's it like?
Les Pauls are not great for that upper neck access compared to a Jackson My 57LP is huge around the cut away and I really struggle to get up there sometimes. I think the binding has something to do with it also.Red Fred wrote: Yeah the only issue I had with going from Jackson neck size to '59 LP neck was like hitting a bend on the high e at the 22nd fret while standing but it's not too bad.
Yeah, I've found my PRS to be the same, hard to get those upper notes.TMG 03 wrote:Les Pauls are not great for that upper neck access compared to a Jackson My 57LP is huge around the cut away and I really struggle to get up there sometimes. I think the binding has something to do with it also.Red Fred wrote: Yeah the only issue I had with going from Jackson neck size to '59 LP neck was like hitting a bend on the high e at the 22nd fret while standing but it's not too bad.
- angry_young_poet
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 1890
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2003 12:04 am
- Location: Wellington
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 14 times
Ok. I gave an opinion on the basis of only having maple necks on my gats. Not quite fair, or objective anyway. But I have now acquired a Rosewood necked gat to do a comparison. This is an almost new gat, and has a very flat radius, not too sure about that yet! But I guess I can do a proper comparison of Maple/Rosewood now. gimme some time. So far there seems to be a difference between the older and the new which I do not attribute to fretboard wood....yet.
We can forgive the child who is afraid of the dark, we cannot forgive the adult who is afraid of the light!
- Rog
- The Self-Proclaimed Voice of Reason
- Posts: 9291
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 12:30 pm
- Location: Under de mountain
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 66 times
As we've all said - there is no right answer generically. It is all right for each of us when it feels right for us as individuals.
I had two Strats, one maple, one rosewood. I sold the rosewood. For my playing, the rosewood just didn't feel as nice as the maple, therefore I hardly ever played the rosewood one. For my style, maple is also faster and lends itself better to hammer-ons and bending etc. Others obviously find the opposite.
Sometimes, the sound doesn't matter as much as the feel to me, especially since I play over 80% of the time unplugged (that is - I tend to practice at home without being amplified).
I had two Strats, one maple, one rosewood. I sold the rosewood. For my playing, the rosewood just didn't feel as nice as the maple, therefore I hardly ever played the rosewood one. For my style, maple is also faster and lends itself better to hammer-ons and bending etc. Others obviously find the opposite.
Sometimes, the sound doesn't matter as much as the feel to me, especially since I play over 80% of the time unplugged (that is - I tend to practice at home without being amplified).
He hit a chord that rocked the spinet and disappeared into the infinite ...
- GrantB
- ADMIN
- Posts: 15962
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:04 am
- Location: Where I need to be
- Has liked: 1377 times
- Been liked: 2107 times
Actually, a good point derived from that DrRog - possibly subconciously we are relating our preference to the actual feel of the neck and setup. That is, if I played a very well set-up and radiused Maple f/board neck vs. a poorly set-up super thin Rosewood f/board neck maybe I'd think Maple was a better fingerboard? Just a thought...
"Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible god and destroys a visible nature. Unaware that this nature he's destroying is this god he's worshipping." - Hubert Reeves
Your probably right.*UNIQUE* wrote:Actually, a good point derived from that DrRog - possibly subconciously we are relating our preference to the actual feel of the neck and setup. That is, if I played a very well set-up and radiused Maple f/board neck vs. a poorly set-up super thin Rosewood f/board neck maybe I'd think Maple was a better fingerboard? Just a thought...
I like maple on a strat, good rosewood on just about everything else. Just a feel thing I guess.
"Under the monsters claws and in between his teeth
Was the shadow and a silhouette of what I thought I’d be
I don’t mind falling down and scraping up my knees
Scars and Stitches always fade and only strengthen me."
- Guster
Was the shadow and a silhouette of what I thought I’d be
I don’t mind falling down and scraping up my knees
Scars and Stitches always fade and only strengthen me."
- Guster
I feel so inadequate. I can spot the difference between a Strat and Les Paul and thats about it.
I bought some EL34 valves to run in my Mk iv. (it can run 6L6's 6V6's EL34's in various combinations. Didnt sound any different to me, slight volume difference.
To me the major difference is pickups and weight (ignoring trem)
As I said, I feel so inadequate.
I bought some EL34 valves to run in my Mk iv. (it can run 6L6's 6V6's EL34's in various combinations. Didnt sound any different to me, slight volume difference.
To me the major difference is pickups and weight (ignoring trem)
As I said, I feel so inadequate.
Never put down to malice what can adequately be explained by stupidity