Got Head?........Room
Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black
- Kloppsta
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 2489
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:09 pm
- Location: Auckland
- Has liked: 84 times
- Been liked: 93 times
There still seems to be the same old misunderstanding that gain and power mean the same. You could have an amp running at, say, "3", and another one at, say "7", the actual volume out being the same. This is a factor of gain, and how sensitive the amplifier is to an input signal, it is not power.
Power is the actual voltage being fed into the speakers (which for the the measurement of RMS power) are treated as a resistive load, so power is in effect the ability of the amplifier to generate power, as measured in Watts. Ohms law: Watts = Volts (sine wave) squared divided by the resistance (speaker load, eg 4 ohms, 8 ohms etc).
So my puny little Custom Vibrolux Reverb can still kick, uh, rear ends, at 40 Watts. Which even that amount it struggles it to get to when I measure it.
Power is the actual voltage being fed into the speakers (which for the the measurement of RMS power) are treated as a resistive load, so power is in effect the ability of the amplifier to generate power, as measured in Watts. Ohms law: Watts = Volts (sine wave) squared divided by the resistance (speaker load, eg 4 ohms, 8 ohms etc).
So my puny little Custom Vibrolux Reverb can still kick, uh, rear ends, at 40 Watts. Which even that amount it struggles it to get to when I measure it.
"That stuff you play really bugs me out"
- Rog
- The Self-Proclaimed Voice of Reason
- Posts: 9291
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 12:30 pm
- Location: Under de mountain
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 66 times
DC4 I hear what you are saying, but you must understand that without a wattmeter on the amp, the volume control is the only indication we can use for such a discussion.
With Ohm's law for outputs of amplifiers, we are dealing with Z rather than R, and X and consequently Z will vary considerably with f, so there is no way anyone can say what power out is at any point in time, or even averaged across a song.
That is why the volume knob becomes the norm for this.
With Ohm's law for outputs of amplifiers, we are dealing with Z rather than R, and X and consequently Z will vary considerably with f, so there is no way anyone can say what power out is at any point in time, or even averaged across a song.
That is why the volume knob becomes the norm for this.
He hit a chord that rocked the spinet and disappeared into the infinite ...
- Bg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 43413
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 12:13 am
- Location: Auckland
- Has liked: 2276 times
- Been liked: 3991 times
Rog, my point entirely. So, we are talking about is gain, and not power then.
Hehheh, not that I'm TRYING to be pedantic...
Anyway, being pedantic, just for fun, Z is impedance, measured in ohms and yes it is f (frequency) dependant, and yes, speakers impedance varies with the frequency. Of course they do have a DC reistance, but is generally about 25% less than the stated impedance. I think they are measured at 400 Hz, for a spec value. (Unless it is a tweeter)
Amplifiers can be measured much more exactly at whatever frequency you want, for specs, and their impedance doesn't vary with frequency.
But what the stuff "X" is? Well, except an unknown quantity...
Anyway. Enough already.
Hehheh, not that I'm TRYING to be pedantic...
Anyway, being pedantic, just for fun, Z is impedance, measured in ohms and yes it is f (frequency) dependant, and yes, speakers impedance varies with the frequency. Of course they do have a DC reistance, but is generally about 25% less than the stated impedance. I think they are measured at 400 Hz, for a spec value. (Unless it is a tweeter)
Amplifiers can be measured much more exactly at whatever frequency you want, for specs, and their impedance doesn't vary with frequency.
But what the stuff "X" is? Well, except an unknown quantity...
Anyway. Enough already.
"That stuff you play really bugs me out"
- Rog
- The Self-Proclaimed Voice of Reason
- Posts: 9291
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 12:30 pm
- Location: Under de mountain
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 66 times
X is total reactance, being inductive and capacitance reactance combined. Although the capacitive reactance is less signficant than the inductive reactance in speakers, I thought I'd just account for it by considering only total reactance, X.
> Rog, my point entirely. So, we are talking about is gain, and not power then.
Yes, we are, but attempting to quantify gain for this application is less easy that 'pretending' it is power, don't you think?
> Rog, my point entirely. So, we are talking about is gain, and not power then.
Yes, we are, but attempting to quantify gain for this application is less easy that 'pretending' it is power, don't you think?
He hit a chord that rocked the spinet and disappeared into the infinite ...
Bugga. OK, now I know what "X" is.
Some one once told me they were an "expert".
Wanting a definition of "expert" I researched this extensively and found...
So, "X" was an unknown quantity, and "spert" is a drip under pressure.
So I thought. Now I've got to re-work that...
Bugga.
Some one once told me they were an "expert".
Wanting a definition of "expert" I researched this extensively and found...
So, "X" was an unknown quantity, and "spert" is a drip under pressure.
So I thought. Now I've got to re-work that...
Bugga.
"That stuff you play really bugs me out"