Muti-fx/ footswitch organisation

Gear Aquisition Syndrome is a serious disorder.... FX etc

Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black

Post Reply
Basket Case
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 2963
meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:06 am
Location: Whangarei
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 111 times

Muti-fx/ footswitch organisation

Post by Basket Case »

For those of you who use some sort of programmable multi-fx, midi foot switch etc in a live in situation what's your approach to ordering your patches on your footswitch?

I use a FCB1010 and have fx in the top row and patches on the bottom. From left to right with the rigs I try to order them in the same sequence they appear in the song, for example, switch 1 would be the intro patch, switch 2 would be the verse and so on. I always put my solo rig as the 5th switch (furtherest to the right) so it's always in the same place and I'm less likely to stuff up my solo by standing on the wrong switch.

The trouble with this approach, or any I can think of is that it can get really difficult to remember where each patch is, especially when different songs require different numbers of patches and parts repeat throughout the song.

In the past (with other gear) I've gone from least gain on the left to highest gain on the right, but this always has its complications too. Other times I've tried to minimise the number of patches I use by switching the individual effects in and out- but that can be a recipe for disaster in a live situation, especially when multiple changes are needed.

What system do you find works best?

User avatar
HackSaw
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 2820
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 6:34 am
Location: AKL
Has liked: 146 times
Been liked: 539 times

Re: Muti-fx/ footswitch organisation

Post by HackSaw »

Basket Case wrote: What system do you find works best?
Only play AC/DC covers.

User avatar
jeremyb
Chorus of Organs
Posts: 43321
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
Has liked: 8582 times
Been liked: 4450 times

Re: Muti-fx/ footswitch organisation

Post by jeremyb »

What I used to do was have my patches across the bottom as well, effects across the top, the patches were simple:

1 - Clean
2 - Clean with delay and reverb
3 - Dirt
4 - Dirt with delay and reverb

And within each I had some additional effects that could be turned on and off as well as the delay and reverb if needs be.
Standing on top of the world

User avatar
sirvill
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 3166
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:54 pm
Location: Wellington
Has liked: 115 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: Muti-fx/ footswitch organisation

Post by sirvill »

Depends, do you have a few "sounds" which you use in different places, or is each patch for each part of each song completely custom?

For bass I've got clean, overdrive, distorted, a patch with flanger delay and reverb, envelope filter, octave, and another ambient patch.

On the MS-3 banking up and down requires a double-footswitch press which is a bit too uncertain for me, so I prefer not to change banks mid-song. So I made a matrix of which sounds I need for each track we're doing.

I then arranged the sounds in banks so the sounds I need for each song are in the same bank - and a number of songs can share a bank if it works out that way. I don't need a heap of sounds so I kept clean and OD as patch 1 and patch 2 on every bank so that makes things easier to remember.

kwhelan
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1400
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 9:25 pm
Has liked: 123 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Muti-fx/ footswitch organisation

Post by kwhelan »

if your actually loading different patches for each part of a song rather than just enabling/disabling certain effects you really should be running midi, program all the patch changes in to each song, in order and maybe even to a click track if your doing exact covers then just choose song patch and go/stop on the midi controller
could use an ipad or laptop to control it even

User avatar
Cdog
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 4485
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:01 pm
Location: Christchurch
Has liked: 3738 times
Been liked: 760 times

Re: Muti-fx/ footswitch organisation

Post by Cdog »

Gone back to individual pedulz, but I used to have the same pattern each bank on the Line 6 Multishizzle
1 - Clean
2- Dirt
3- Lead
4 - Special... normally a song specific effect etc
Never had the 5th switch! These days I pretty much use 2-3 pedals a set

User avatar
Lawrence
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1488
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Beta Canum Venaticorum
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 618 times

Re: Muti-fx/ footswitch organisation

Post by Lawrence »

Ive always kept the number of song specific patches to an absolute minimum. basically only when there is such a major effect in the song that is unusual. For 95% of songs I use MY sounds...which have always been based on:
1. Clean Rhythm
2. Drive rhythm
3. Clean solo
4. Drive solo.

I typically had 4 banks with

a)vintage - no mod fx on, mild drives...a bit of reverb
b) classic - maybe phaser on clean ryhthym, tape echoes
c) modern - chorus on clean rhythm
d) custom - sort of mesa stayed with long delays etc

On the helix I have defined the switches as snap shots along the from in the format 1-4 above, and patches along the back as per a -d above.

The extra mojo I have with helix is that Ive denied the patches to recall different snapshots so:
vintage patch recalls clean rhythm snap
classic patch recalls drive rhythm
Modern patch recalls clean solo
Custom patch recalls drive solo.

This means I can go easily across all 4 snaps and all 4 patchers in one song without any stress. 16 tones all mine!
GrantB wrote:
“You might be cool, but you’ll never be playing a white Steinberger through a JC120, wearing a white jumpsuit with white shoes and sporting a mullet cool”.

Post Reply