How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Its all in the fingers, or is it?

Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black

PlukkyBoy
Squier
Posts: 361
meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 3:48 pm
Location: Taranaki

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by PlukkyBoy »

bbrunskill wrote:However, if your primary focus is your tone, and you never work on timing, technique, theory and taste, then you'll be crap, and no one will want to play with you.
Tone has to develop, alongside and in conjunction with the rest of your skill on the instrument.
If only you could have told me this ten years ago...

User avatar
Rog
The Self-Proclaimed Voice of Reason
Posts: 9294
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 12:30 pm
Location: Under de mountain
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 66 times

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by Rog »

I used to think that tone on bass was not very important, until I bought some Gibson basses. Then I realised that it really does matter and went back to Fenders.
He hit a chord that rocked the spinet and disappeared into the infinite ...

User avatar
Bg
Site Admin
Posts: 43457
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 12:13 am
Location: Auckland
Has liked: 2279 times
Been liked: 4013 times

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by Bg »

Tone is exactly proportionate to the effort you put in to create it...
So, is that low alcohol or no alcohol at all? mmmm, no alcohol, do you want to try it? Noooooooooo.

User avatar
Scooter13
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 2150
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 6:24 pm
Location: Wellington
Has liked: 40 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by Scooter13 »

I agree with the point that as soon as you think you are ready, your are. I don't care if I see someone who can't play owning killer gear, if it makes them happy then go for it (providing they didn't outbid me on trademe).

However, I reckon everyone should own some ultra crap gear at some stage, preferably when you are first learning. It makes you appreciate "good" gear that much more later on.

And saving your money for one real good piece of equipment is better than incrementally changing little things you can afford at the moment I reckon....it's like abstaining from sex with a new hot girlfriend/bf....the longer you wait, the better it is when it comes. (Of course this also means that the gf/bf/equipment could find another owner, or vice versa) :lol:

Then when you got that real good guitar and amp combo you can be more focused on little things.

Of course some of us simply can't save for that long to buy the things we really want...which is why finance is cool sometimes if you can afford it/be responsible with it :P

User avatar
jeremyb
Chorus of Organs
Posts: 41876
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
Has liked: 7930 times
Been liked: 4268 times

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by jeremyb »

If you're worried about tone you're not playing loud enough.
Slowy wrote: That's the problem; everything rewarding is just such hard work. Regret takes much less effort.

User avatar
DarcyPerry
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1863
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:04 pm
Location: Waikato

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by DarcyPerry »

Right now is a good time to care about tone. :D Keep caring on your journey.

The type of guitar you play is not as important as how you play it. Buy an Ibanez anyway. :wink:

Tube amps are cool (I like 'em) but great tone can be had with solid state, or even straight into the desk. Too many examples of this to list.

Take your pick and try a different edge, or throw it away! I play with my fingers and that helps me. I also tried acrylic nails, flamenco style, for a while but now I use the flesh pads and keep the nails short. Or try a coin. It works for Brian May.

Tone is in the ears of the beholder. Here is a great tone in my opinion. Seasick Steve playing Cut My Wings. Take note of his fingerstyle on a beat up, 75 dollar, three string guitar and well-travelled, reliable solid state amp.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RlUwS1LKRs[/youtube]

Enjoy your tone quest! 8)
"It's all a gift... and I have to keep giving it back, or it goes away. If I start believing that it's all my doing, it's gonna be my undoing." - Stevie Ray Vaughan
http://www.darcyperry.co.nz

machina
Tokai
Tokai
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by machina »

LOVE Seasick Steve! Saw him at Glastonbury last year, just him and another gnarly old dude with long hair thrashing the shit outta some drums. Was totally awesome. Raw as hell.

User avatar
badmotor
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 2902
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Auckland

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by badmotor »

+1 on loving Seasick Steve.
Hot_Grits wrote:Someone should print this thread out and hang it in an art gallery.

User avatar
electric68
Ashton
Ashton
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:42 pm
Location: North Shore

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by electric68 »

+2 on Seasick Steve - his dilapidated gear makes me embarrassed to have good gear and never sound as good.

BTW, re gear - I agree a guitar that is physically enjoyable to play is really important (unless you're Jack White and claim you want to struggle to play...). I also have had really good guitars and similarly great amps which hate one another - maybe someone technical can explain it, but I look for a guitar and amp that interact with one another, especially at levels which make the amp do some work (does that make sense???).
Myself, being a Bear of Little Brain....

User avatar
Zaulkin
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 5465
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:01 pm
Has liked: 762 times
Been liked: 532 times

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by Zaulkin »

Tsuken wrote:
jeremyb wrote:Tone is subjective, and the only people that ever care are other guitarists :mrgreen:
Seriously I reckon you should be thinking about tone from day one - but not in terms of gear. The most important things are to do with your playing: your intonation, the way you hold the strings, the way you pick (and what with), your vibrato. You also want to ensure whatever gear you have is set up optimally.
This!

Tone is always there and while having good gear may help, you will still sound like you through whatever gear you play. Make the best of what you have by keeping it well set up and if you can afford to upgrade, then do it, but don't neglect a part of your playing because you are waiting on some new stuff. There are plenty of amazing guitarists at my uni and some of them can only afford a $300 guitar.

User avatar
willow13
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 14558
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:36 pm
Location: If less is more then just think how much more more is
Has liked: 372 times
Been liked: 634 times

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by willow13 »

Zaulkin wrote:
Tsuken wrote:
jeremyb wrote:Tone is subjective, and the only people that ever care are other guitarists :mrgreen:
Seriously I reckon you should be thinking about tone from day one - but not in terms of gear. The most important things are to do with your playing: your intonation, the way you hold the strings, the way you pick (and what with), your vibrato. You also want to ensure whatever gear you have is set up optimally.
This!

Tone is always there and while having good gear may help, you will still sound like you through whatever gear you play. Make the best of what you have by keeping it well set up and if you can afford to upgrade, then do it, but don't neglect a part of your playing because you are waiting on some new stuff. There are plenty of amazing guitarists at my uni and some of them can only afford a $300 guitar.
These!

know matter what guitar/amp combo I play it still sounds the same, which can be a pain because when I play a les paul it just doesn't have the Fat bottom end that you would usually associate with a LP...I make them sound thin and weaselly :lol:
If Less is More Then Just Think How Much More More would be

User avatar
alanp
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 4637
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:51 am
Location: Wanganui
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 11 times
Contact:

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by alanp »

machina wrote:LOVE Seasick Steve! Saw him at Glastonbury last year, just him and another gnarly old dude with long hair thrashing the shit outta some drums. Was totally awesome. Raw as hell.
http://www.amp-fix.com/amps.htm

Minor article by John Beer on fixing Seasick Steve's tweed bassman. Kinda funny, the cones are ripped and whatnot, but Seasick still says don't fix it! They never sound as good once they've been fixed!
Capt. Black wrote:Call me if you're looking for the sound of a sows ear made from a silk purse with a side of hot bitches and alcohol

machina
Tokai
Tokai
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by machina »

alanp wrote:
machina wrote:LOVE Seasick Steve! Saw him at Glastonbury last year, just him and another gnarly old dude with long hair thrashing the shit outta some drums. Was totally awesome. Raw as hell.
http://www.amp-fix.com/amps.htm

Minor article by John Beer on fixing Seasick Steve's tweed bassman. Kinda funny, the cones are ripped and whatnot, but Seasick still says don't fix it! They never sound as good once they've been fixed!
Thanks dude, that was a cool little read. Cool to know that's what he was using at Glasto. I'd love to have a totally thrashed old amp like that, heaps of mojo.

User avatar
Hot_Grits
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 3730
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 2:03 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 5 times

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by Hot_Grits »

To me tone (in all the various definitions applied to it) is essentially a subset of musicianship.

insomuch as: worrying about your sound is the same as worrying about a sonic component of your band or recorded work.

So, if 'is my tone any good?' is reframed as 'does my music sound good?' or 'am I inspired to create?' -then it seems to me that any time is a good time to think about it.

It just happens that it takes a few years for most us to start grappling with the tone issue. I think most of that is down to the process of gathering experience, in terms of listening to music as a musician, playing music and trying equipment.
jeremyb wrote: Is it true about the bum sex before marriage thing being ok?

User avatar
Hot_Grits
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 3730
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 2:03 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 5 times

Re: How Good Should You Be Before You Care About Tone?

Post by Hot_Grits »

bbrunskill wrote:I don't think it's ever too early to be thinking about and improving your tone.

However, if your primary focus is your tone, and you never work on timing, technique, theory and taste, then you'll be crap, and no one will want to play with you.
Tone has to develop, alongside and in conjunction with the rest of your skill on the instrument.
I reckon tone is timing, technique and taste as much as it is anything else.

The example I often give is how much the sound of a guitar part in a mix can change if moved a tiny smidge left or right in protools. It's still the same tone. But the timing in relation to the rest of the elements in the track has changed the sound in a very hearable way.

Theory: not so much.
jeremyb wrote: Is it true about the bum sex before marriage thing being ok?

Post Reply