Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, but..

Its all in the fingers, or is it?

Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black

Basket Case
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 2983
meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:06 am
Location: Whangarei
Has liked: 51 times
Been liked: 114 times

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by Basket Case »

te_chris wrote:
Basket Case wrote:
Spruce_Moose wrote:Does anyone else think that over-complicated guitar solos are just plain fucking boring? I mean, I used to think guitarists like Vai and Satriani were amazing when I was about 15.. but now everything about it makes me want to puke (self-indulgence, tone, chorus, signature guitars & amps etc...). I know it's a really subjective thing to say, but why is this tacky style so popular among guitarists?
Yeah, and then there's Beethoven, Vivaldi and all those other Classical posers. If only you'd been around then to tell them how "over-complicated" they were being.

lol, sorry but the comparison you're drawing is base. satriani and vai != to vivaldi and beethoven. ever.

paganinin et al, maybe.
You missed my point.

Anyway, I can't think of anything by Vai, and especially Satriani that is "over complicated," and it's not like they play 20 notes per second non stop. When they do play fast it's just another means of expressing something. Sure, there are some guitarists who go for speed over substance, but there are also those who can use a flurry of the right notes at the right time to be really expressive. There are a shit load of "simple" players (for want of an antonym) who are completely boring too.

User avatar
Tsuken
In the Name of Vai
Posts: 2328
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:54 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by Tsuken »

jeremyb wrote:Each to their own, takes a fair bit of skill to play fast and a fair bit of feeling to play slow.
False dichotomy. Slow does not equate to feel, and fast doesn't preclude feel.
My twitting tweets of twitterness

@ash lol/RT "@ChelseaVPeretti Had fun in the Cinema Tent tonight w @adultswim @robcorddry #bonnaroo #fonz #hottubtimemachineintonationjokes #childrenshospital #mud #pee" //by @Jenesis

Here be bloggins

User avatar
Terexgeek
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 4617
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:12 pm
Location: Christchurch
Has liked: 1224 times
Been liked: 375 times

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by Terexgeek »

Tsuken wrote:
jeremyb wrote:Each to their own, takes a fair bit of skill to play fast and a fair bit of feeling to play slow.
False dichotomy. Slow does not equate to feel, and fast doesn't preclude feel.
I don't think you've disagreed with his post, you might like to re-read it :wink:

Just because all fish aren't mackerel, doesn't stop all mackerel from being fish.

Would it have clarified things if he added "well" after each instance of "play"?

Your post adds additional prepositions that I doubt (although I'm happy to be corrected) Jez would argue with.
Tin arse!!

User avatar
Tsuken
In the Name of Vai
Posts: 2328
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:54 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by Tsuken »

Terexgeek wrote:
Tsuken wrote:
jeremyb wrote:Each to their own, takes a fair bit of skill to play fast and a fair bit of feeling to play slow.
False dichotomy. Slow does not equate to feel, and fast doesn't preclude feel.
I don't think you've disagreed with his post, you might like to re-read it :wink:

Just because all fish aren't mackerel, doesn't stop all mackerel from being fish.

Would it have clarified things if he added "well" after each instance of "play"?

Your post adds additional prepositions that I doubt (although I'm happy to be corrected) Jez would argue with.
The way it's phrased it buys into the standard flash vs feel bollocks. I can accept that might not be what was meant in this case, but the post does reinforce that notion - when in fact it takes a fair bit of skill and feeling to play well.

Fast or slow doesn't matter. Attaching "feeling" only to "slow" suggests ... ah, I'm sure you get my point. ;)
My twitting tweets of twitterness

@ash lol/RT "@ChelseaVPeretti Had fun in the Cinema Tent tonight w @adultswim @robcorddry #bonnaroo #fonz #hottubtimemachineintonationjokes #childrenshospital #mud #pee" //by @Jenesis

Here be bloggins

User avatar
Vince
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 7495
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:31 pm
Location: Upper Hutt The Brave
Has liked: 405 times
Been liked: 202 times
Contact:

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by Vince »

One thing I find odd, personally, is the OPs apparent assumption that NZG is a shred forum?
"Vince, have you ever tried playing an expensive bass?" - Polarbear.
"And isn't that the finest acoustic bass guitar feedback solo you've ever heard?" - Billy Moose.

My Bandcamp Page
Facebook

User avatar
dayl
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 5636
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:40 pm
Has liked: 574 times
Been liked: 522 times

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by dayl »

Vince wrote:One thing I find odd, personally, is the OPs apparent assumption that NZG is a shred forum?
Yup, pretty sure that we ran a couple polls recently that resulted in the opposite.

Gatdan777
Stagg
Stagg
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:15 pm

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by Gatdan777 »

Spruce_Moose wrote:Does anyone else think that over-complicated guitar solos are just plain fucking boring? I mean, I used to think guitarists like Vai and Satriani were amazing when I was about 15.. but now everything about it makes me want to puke (self-indulgence, tone, chorus, signature guitars & amps etc...). I know it's a really subjective thing to say, but why is this tacky style so popular among guitarists?


Preach it brother!
" Good music is as much about the space between the notes, as the notes themselves." - Sting

User avatar
jeremyb
Chorus of Organs
Posts: 45107
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
Has liked: 9559 times
Been liked: 4860 times

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by jeremyb »

Tsuken wrote:
jeremyb wrote:Each to their own, takes a fair bit of skill to play fast and a fair bit of feeling to play slow.
False dichotomy. Slow does not equate to feel, and fast doesn't preclude feel.
DOH, I was trying to be complimentary to both styles as I enjoy both, and also totally agree with you btw :?
How can I be sure I'm here?
The pills that I've been taking confuse me...

User avatar
Hot_Grits
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 3730
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 2:03 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by Hot_Grits »

Danger Mouse wrote:
Hot_Grits wrote:
Spruce_Moose wrote:Does anyone else think that over-complicated guitar solos are just plain fucking boring? I mean, I used to think guitarists like Vai and Satriani were amazing when I was about 15.. but now everything about it makes me want to puke (self-indulgence, tone, chorus, signature guitars & amps etc...). I know it's a really subjective thing to say, but why is this tacky style so popular among guitarists?
Most of the world thinks over-complicated guitar solos are just plain fucking boring. But we're on a guitar forum here, so strange demographic oddness happens. I reckon for every forum member that gets a semi when they hear a widdly solo there's probably 50 members of the general public (and one or three forum members) that would rather pick at a fresh rash than listen to said solo. Doesn't make the widdle-friendly forum member wrong in any way. It just is what it is.

A forum like this can quite an accurate mirror on society when it comes to everyday issues. But when it comes to art-related stuff like taste in guitar solos it's kind of skewed. Kind of like someone hanging out with the 15 dudes who dig rugby in Brazil and thinking 'Brazil sure is crazy about rugby...'
That can be said about pretty much any special interest group and in modern times, there will be an associated forum (or several forums) where the interested parties can discuss what ever it is that is important to them and of no interest to 99.99% of the rest of the world's population. And of course within those groups there will be some who like something specific and those who don't. We're not unique by any stretch of the imagination.
oh yeah, this is applicable to any 'broad topic' kind of online community.
jeremyb wrote: Is it true about the bum sex before marriage thing being ok?

hamo
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 21642
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Wellington, NZ
Has liked: 776 times
Been liked: 946 times

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by hamo »

What's defined as "over-complicated"? I think I know what the OP means, but really, that's pretty subjective.

I guess if you spend years learning your craft, you might want to push the envelope a little bit, and repeatedly riffing on the guys that Jimmy Paige riffeed on just doesn't do it for some people.

Having said that, sure I agree in some measure that technical for technical's sake can be boring, especially if you don't know what makes it so technical or difficult. It's like an architect looking at a building and appreciating how difficult challenges were solved, where non-architects might look at it and go "what an ugly building", or not notice it at all. And instrumental music has an extra challenge to try to be interesting to more than just musicians IMO.

Personally, I like a little bit of edge or bombast in shred. Something with a lot of life to it, like Satch Boogie by Satch or Juice and Bad Horsie by Vai. Either that or its got to be haunting and evocative.

EDIT: Oh, and dissing shred is unlikely to get you banned from a blues forum... :wink:
Aquila Rosso wrote:I don't a mind an iced tea rimjob one little bit :congrats:
Molly wrote:Trousers are no substitute for talent
druz wrote:I present to you, the whogivesafuckocaster

thehenderson
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:50 am
Location: Wellington

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by thehenderson »

I prefer some good lyrics and a snappy arrangement over solos

thehenderson
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:50 am
Location: Wellington

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by thehenderson »

hamo wrote:Oh, and dissing shred is unlikely to get you banned from a blues forum... :wink:
Lol at Hamo's faith that NZGs isn't bogan to the core

User avatar
Tsuken
In the Name of Vai
Posts: 2328
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:54 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by Tsuken »

Hot_Grits wrote:
Danger Mouse wrote:That can be said about pretty much any special interest group and in modern times, there will be an associated forum (or several forums) where the interested parties can discuss what ever it is that is important to them and of no interest to 99.99% of the rest of the world's population. And of course within those groups there will be some who like something specific and those who don't. We're not unique by any stretch of the imagination.
oh yeah, this is applicable to any 'broad topic' kind of online community.
Example: http://www.coffeesnobs.com.au ;)
My twitting tweets of twitterness

@ash lol/RT "@ChelseaVPeretti Had fun in the Cinema Tent tonight w @adultswim @robcorddry #bonnaroo #fonz #hottubtimemachineintonationjokes #childrenshospital #mud #pee" //by @Jenesis

Here be bloggins

hamo
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 21642
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Wellington, NZ
Has liked: 776 times
Been liked: 946 times

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by hamo »

thehenderson wrote:
hamo wrote:Oh, and dissing shred is unlikely to get you banned from a blues forum... :wink:
Lol at Hamo's faith that NZGs isn't bogan to the core
BG stands for Bogan Geek now? :shock:
Aquila Rosso wrote:I don't a mind an iced tea rimjob one little bit :congrats:
Molly wrote:Trousers are no substitute for talent
druz wrote:I present to you, the whogivesafuckocaster

xCaptainx
Vintage Post Junkie
Vintage Post Junkie
Posts: 1404
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Auckland
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 52 times

Re: Ok, so this is probably going get me banned from here, b

Post by xCaptainx »

I've got mixed tastes regarding 'shredders'

I LOVE watching shred videos, I find the technique and skill facinating. That being said, most of the 'chops from hell' style 'bedroom shredders' you see on youtube/instructional sites have horrible song arrangement. Their technique videos are much better than their 'songs' haha. I think the only 'shred' song I've ever fallen in love with was Always WIth Me by Satriani. That song got me into guitar pretty much, haha.

Now a great metal band with a great guitarist, that's what I prefer. Kris Norris from Darkest Hour is a perfect example of great technique, skill and songwriting. The albums with Darkest Hour that Kris played on (Deliver Us and Undoing Ruin) have some brilliant examples of melody, song structure and tasteful shred. I dont have access to youtube at the moment but look up 'Darkest Hour - Tranquil' the 3rd quarter guitar solo is beautiful.

Plus his instructional dvd has sections on SONGWRITING. Something many instructional dvd's lack! haha.

Post Reply