Building an archtop of some sorts
Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black
- bender
- Darth Fader
- Posts: 12056
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
- Location: Dorkland
- Has liked: 449 times
- Been liked: 1090 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
Ahhh... macropcapa. Yeah, probably not the best choice. Knotty as fuck and easy to tear.
Top angle- So you've elected to keep the pickup area flat, and just angle the neck-join area. I would have thought that part of the advantage of angling from the bridge pickup to the end of the body is that the pickup heights don't have to be quite as greatly staggered. How high is your bridge going to be?
Top angle- So you've elected to keep the pickup area flat, and just angle the neck-join area. I would have thought that part of the advantage of angling from the bridge pickup to the end of the body is that the pickup heights don't have to be quite as greatly staggered. How high is your bridge going to be?
- Jay
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8567
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:35 pm
- Has liked: 2031 times
- Been liked: 1665 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
Choice was on purpose as I did not want to use expensive timber on my first arched top in case things went wrong. But your assessment is totaly correct.bender wrote:Ahhh... macropcapa. Yeah, probably not the best choice. Knotty as fuck and easy to tear.
Top angle- So you've elected to keep the pickup area flat, and just angle the neck-join area. I would have thought that part of the advantage of angling from the bridge pickup to the end of the body is that the pickup heights don't have to be quite as greatly staggered. How high is your bridge going to be?
On the 6120 there is quite a difference already between the two pickup heights, despite the slope between them. Currently I am aiming for the strings to be between 20-25 mm above the top of the board when going over the bridge.
I was going to put a dummy neck on and take some more accurate measurements... I may yet have to do more planing/carving.

"I have never played a D7 there"
- Jay
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8567
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:35 pm
- Has liked: 2031 times
- Been liked: 1665 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
Has been a while, progress is very slow...
Made a simple 'pointy' tool so that the bulk of the inside can be removed by drill bit. Problem is I need a deeper throat...




Made a simple 'pointy' tool so that the bulk of the inside can be removed by drill bit. Problem is I need a deeper throat...




"I have never played a D7 there"
- Bg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 44444
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 12:13 am
- Location: Sunny Nelson
- Has liked: 2410 times
- Been liked: 4314 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
apart from linda, yeah a deep throat is always needed. But do yourself a favour and get at least a 25mm forstner bit to get the bulk of that out? I use mine before routing anything big too.
Its not enough that we succeed, we still need others to fail
- Jay
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8567
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:35 pm
- Has liked: 2031 times
- Been liked: 1665 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
Yes, a forstner bit is on my list for flat surfaces. Not suitable for this work as I am trying to achieve a uniform thickness of the arch.Bg wrote:apart from linda, yeah a deep throat is always needed. But do yourself a favour and get at least a 25mm forstner bit to get the bulk of that out? I use mine before routing anything big too.
"I have never played a D7 there"
- Bg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 44444
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 12:13 am
- Location: Sunny Nelson
- Has liked: 2410 times
- Been liked: 4314 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
yeah I get your point but can't you bulk it out a little first? Even freehand with a router and step it?
Its not enough that we succeed, we still need others to fail
- Jay
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8567
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:35 pm
- Has liked: 2031 times
- Been liked: 1665 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
Found Linda!Bg wrote:apart from linda, yeah a deep throat is always needed. .
A router copyer would be sooo handy to have...

Lots more sanding to do. Dirty and tedious work


"I have never played a D7 there"
- Jay
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8567
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:35 pm
- Has liked: 2031 times
- Been liked: 1665 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
Anyone considering building an archtop? I thoroughly recommend the experience
My respect for reputable archtop builders is increasing quite a bit. Mind you, they have better tools than I have...
These F holes were a real F'in pain to make...




My respect for reputable archtop builders is increasing quite a bit. Mind you, they have better tools than I have...
These F holes were a real F'in pain to make...



"I have never played a D7 there"
- bigporridgeday
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 4535
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:20 am
- Location: Te Whanganui-a-Tara
- Has liked: 274 times
- Been liked: 648 times
- sizzlingbadger
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8647
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:12 am
- Location: Wire Wrapper
- Has liked: 1341 times
- Been liked: 1517 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
Aren't they normally made from thin ply so they resonate ?
"Revolt Against the Solid State"
- Jay
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8567
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:35 pm
- Has liked: 2031 times
- Been liked: 1665 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
Around 6mm after I have sanded the top back in preps for finishing. It is not a consistent thickness as I have reduced the thickness around the F holes to around 4mm (visually more appealing) and also reduced it around where the pots and switches will go (easier to mount). I am not going to use any bracing as you'll find in convential hollow bodies, as the top at 6mm is string enough to take the 'load'.bobiron wrote:What top thickness are you shooting for?
Resonate or vibrate? I understand mass produced archtops use 3 way ply pressed into shape. That includes Gibson's 335. Some models will have an option for a 'hand' carved spruce top or something instead of the ply. Both will vibrate/resonate to produce sound. I think for an acoustic guitar I would prefer a solid spruce top over a ply one. But then again some very good ply top acoustics are around.Post by sizzlingbadger » Thu Jan 26, 2017 3:42 pm
Aren't they normally made from thin ply so they resonate ?
For the one I am making: look at it as a cross between a convential arch top and a solid body with an arched top

"I have never played a D7 there"
- calling card
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 4344
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:56 am
- Location: Hoodoo dump, BOP
- Has liked: 883 times
- Been liked: 283 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
I've used my compressed air die grinder fitted with a chunky router bur for hogging out spaces in wood. Got to hold on tight though @ 10,000 rpm free handing it



2024; I have explored the extent of the perimeter dome, there is no escape. I am become Morpheus
- Jay
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8567
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:35 pm
- Has liked: 2031 times
- Been liked: 1665 times
Re: Building an archtop of some sorts
Hmmm, I used the grinder with flapblade on BG's recommendation. Works a treat but gives me the shits anyway. I find 100rpm already a lot!
"I have never played a D7 there"