NAD (kind of.....): ~'64-65 AC10
Moderators: Slowy, Capt. Black
-
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 1104
- meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 9:13 am
- Has liked: 278 times
- Been liked: 299 times
NAD (kind of.....): ~'64-65 AC10
Not usually one for NAD/NGD's: But a bit of a revisit, and a-ha moment, has motivated me to share my hard-on…..
Purchased this '64-65 AC10 about 10 years ago. It had a visit to Clarry prior to my tenure. Everything was "fine" on it (with reference to the schematic), but it never really sounded like I would have expected. Quite clean (crunched a bit - in a “Beatles” sort of way - when cranked), and a little like the tone control was wound down. Also - and this drove me nuts - I couldn’t hear “much” difference between Hi/Low inputs on each channel. "Maybe that’s just how it was" I thought……"maybe my ears were just s#*t". I’m not a pedal/clean guy, so somewhat ashamedly, it just sat in the corner……for a long, long, time……
Anyway, pulled finger the other day and decided it was time to do something about it.
Wired her up for an attenuator - helped a bit, but still a bit muffled.
Did some research and poking (non-conductive chopstick), and realised that both inputs, on both channels, had the same pretty circle colour thingies from the jack tips (I now know these to be the original 220k resistors). Ha ha dumb arse - no wonder the Hi/Low inputs sounded similar! Turns out Vox did this to “neuter” the AC10 so it sounded “less” than the AC15. 2 x 40c 68k resistors later and she sounds GLORIOUS! Every bit as good as her older brother (an AC30T also from ’64), and now getting some serious catch-up play time......
Anyway, lesson learned: trust your ears, and do something about it sooner rather than later…..
Purchased this '64-65 AC10 about 10 years ago. It had a visit to Clarry prior to my tenure. Everything was "fine" on it (with reference to the schematic), but it never really sounded like I would have expected. Quite clean (crunched a bit - in a “Beatles” sort of way - when cranked), and a little like the tone control was wound down. Also - and this drove me nuts - I couldn’t hear “much” difference between Hi/Low inputs on each channel. "Maybe that’s just how it was" I thought……"maybe my ears were just s#*t". I’m not a pedal/clean guy, so somewhat ashamedly, it just sat in the corner……for a long, long, time……
Anyway, pulled finger the other day and decided it was time to do something about it.
Wired her up for an attenuator - helped a bit, but still a bit muffled.
Did some research and poking (non-conductive chopstick), and realised that both inputs, on both channels, had the same pretty circle colour thingies from the jack tips (I now know these to be the original 220k resistors). Ha ha dumb arse - no wonder the Hi/Low inputs sounded similar! Turns out Vox did this to “neuter” the AC10 so it sounded “less” than the AC15. 2 x 40c 68k resistors later and she sounds GLORIOUS! Every bit as good as her older brother (an AC30T also from ’64), and now getting some serious catch-up play time......
Anyway, lesson learned: trust your ears, and do something about it sooner rather than later…..
Last edited by murky on Sun Jun 13, 2021 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- robthemac
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8775
- Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 3:47 pm
- Has liked: 1124 times
- Been liked: 1445 times
- GrantB
- ADMIN
- Posts: 15962
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 9:04 am
- Location: Where I need to be
- Has liked: 1377 times
- Been liked: 2107 times
Re: NAD (kind of.....): ~'64-65 AC10
Hell yes! Nice work.
AC10 - on my list!
AC10 - on my list!
"Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible god and destroys a visible nature. Unaware that this nature he's destroying is this god he's worshipping." - Hubert Reeves
- bender
- Darth Fader
- Posts: 11870
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:46 pm
- Location: Dorkland
- Has liked: 417 times
- Been liked: 1017 times
-
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 1104
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 9:13 am
- Has liked: 278 times
- Been liked: 299 times
Re: NAD (kind of.....): ~'64-65 AC10
Ironically, it was looking at AC10's as a grab and carry that prompted me to get this sorted....
I haven't compared to a modern AC10. I have owned an AC4HW, AC15HW, (and borrowed CC and C1 series 30's) which I extensively compared to my '64 AC30T and JMJ30 and concluded:
- most (i.e. 80-90%) of the magic is in the old speakers - if you have good ones!
- the other ~20% is in the output transformer - that grindy modulation when dimed, and the smell of burning wax.....
- the electrics can sound close, if they're the same schematic using the same tubes etc (e.g. the JMJ and AC30T sound very similar through the same speakers).
- a 12AX7 preamp will never sound like an EF86.
- you absolutely need a switching system to compare properly - the minute you have to unplug/plug etc, you lose your reference point.
- jeremyb
- Chorus of Organs
- Posts: 41496
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:03 am
- Has liked: 7840 times
- Been liked: 4229 times
Re: NAD (kind of.....): ~'64-65 AC10
Oh man this is so epic, I have the modern one and it’s an exceptional sounding amp, would love to compare with an original!! Are they 10” speakers?
Slowy wrote: That's the problem; everything rewarding is just such hard work. Regret takes much less effort.
-
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 1104
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 9:13 am
- Has liked: 278 times
- Been liked: 299 times
Re: NAD (kind of.....): ~'64-65 AC10
Yeah. 10" Elacs. They only used them for a short time - apparently they would blow (what didn't back then....!) - I can see why: amp's neutered, have to turn right up to get the crunch, but it's still pretty clean so the cone is moving a lot.....
- sizzlingbadger
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8304
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:12 am
- Location: Wire Wrapper
- Has liked: 1218 times
- Been liked: 1408 times
Re: NAD (kind of.....): ~'64-65 AC10
68K grid stoppers are pretty standard on 12AX7 valves, however, the input capacitance on EF86's is about 10 times less so that is why the grid stopper has to be a larger value, 150K is about as low (cut off around 100Khz) as you want to go otherwise you risk RF issues, these can potentially damage the amp without you even hearing them.
When you have the guitar plugged into the Normal jack try plugging in another jack plug (not connecting to anything else) into the other Normal socket and see what happens.
When you have the guitar plugged into the Normal jack try plugging in another jack plug (not connecting to anything else) into the other Normal socket and see what happens.
"Revolt Against the Solid State"
- Jay
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 7853
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:35 pm
- Has liked: 1651 times
- Been liked: 1314 times
Re: NAD (kind of.....): ~'64-65 AC10
I would have thought the 1Mohm resistor was the grid stopper? The 220Kohm would be in series with the input signal and reducing that to 68K would be allow much more signal to get to the grid without negative effects.sizzlingbadger wrote: ↑Mon Jun 14, 2021 12:48 pm 68K grid stoppers are pretty standard on 12AX7 valves, however, the input capacitance on EF86's is about 10 times less so that is why the grid stopper has to be a larger value, 150K is about as low (cut off around 100Khz) as you want to go otherwise you risk RF issues, these can potentially damage the amp without you even hearing them.
When you have the guitar plugged into the Normal jack try plugging in another jack plug (not connecting to anything else) into the other Normal socket and see what happens.
When faced with quality, I recognise it every time.
- sizzlingbadger
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 8304
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:12 am
- Location: Wire Wrapper
- Has liked: 1218 times
- Been liked: 1408 times
Re: NAD (kind of.....): ~'64-65 AC10
The 1M is the Grid leak resistor, it goes between the grid and ground. Grid stoppers go in series with the input and the grid.
The AC10 has two inputs for each channel, each input has a grid stopper that goes to ground when no plug is inserted. When you plug in one lead the grid stopper is in series with the grid. However the other grid stopper is still grounded so they become a "potential divider" essentially halving your input signal (Marshall low input works like this). If you put another plug into the other socket it lifts the grid stopper from ground and you now get the full signal.
The Marshall High/Low inputs is a much better way to do it, it wouldn't take much to change yours, just copy the JTM45 input wiring.
The AC10 has two inputs for each channel, each input has a grid stopper that goes to ground when no plug is inserted. When you plug in one lead the grid stopper is in series with the grid. However the other grid stopper is still grounded so they become a "potential divider" essentially halving your input signal (Marshall low input works like this). If you put another plug into the other socket it lifts the grid stopper from ground and you now get the full signal.
The Marshall High/Low inputs is a much better way to do it, it wouldn't take much to change yours, just copy the JTM45 input wiring.
"Revolt Against the Solid State"
- StrummersOfThunder
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 7325
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:23 pm
- Has liked: 838 times
- Been liked: 1357 times
- olegmcnoleg
- Vintage Post Junkie
- Posts: 5579
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 11:26 am
- Location: Awkland
- Has liked: 867 times
- Been liked: 742 times
Re: NAD (kind of.....): ~'64-65 AC10
respectsizzlingbadger wrote: ↑Mon Jun 14, 2021 2:44 pm The 1M is the Grid leak resistor, it goes between the grid and ground. Grid stoppers go in series with the input and the grid.
The AC10 has two inputs for each channel, each input has a grid stopper that goes to ground when no plug is inserted. When you plug in one lead the grid stopper is in series with the grid. However the other grid stopper is still grounded so they become a "potential divider" essentially halving your input signal (Marshall low input works like this). If you put another plug into the other socket it lifts the grid stopper from ground and you now get the full signal.
The Marshall High/Low inputs is a much better way to do it, it wouldn't take much to change yours, just copy the JTM45 input wiring.